In a landmark decision in Caplan v. Atas, 2021 ONSC 670 (the “Decision”), the Superior Court of Justice recognized the common law tort of internet harassment—proclaiming itself the first common law court outside of the U.S. to recognize the tort.[1] Justice Corbett went on to grant a novel remedy that appears to envision transferring the defendant’s title and ownership of the offending posts and/or accounts to the plaintiffs for the purpose of removing the offending content from the internet.[2] In a case involving decades of extraordinary online abuse by a uniquely recalcitrant plaintiff, the Court was moved to recognize the new tort and grant a novel remedy. While a very significant development in the law, the decision poses a number of unanswered questions, including whether the tort and remedy will survive a potential appeal.
Facts
The Decision related to summary and default judgment motions in four actions against the defendant, Atas, for online defamation and harassment originating as far back as the 1990s. In each case, Atas had launched a campaign of malicious falsehoods as retribution for perceived grievances against the plaintiffs (as well as their friends, family, neighbours and colleagues). Atas used the internet to disseminate a myriad of spurious and damaging accusations, including of negligence, fraud, and pedophilia. Atas used a number of creative means, including posting altered newspaper articles online, disseminating falsified emails to her…
visibility_offDisable flashes
titleMark headings
settingsBackground Color
zoom_outZoom out
zoom_inZoom in
remove_circle_outlineDecrease font
add_circle_outlineIncrease font
spellcheckReadable font
brightness_highBright contrast
brightness_lowDark contrast
format_underlinedUnderline links
font_downloadMark links